Library: Policy

340:75-6-40. Case plan

Revised 7-1-13

     The case plan consists of multiple reports that comprise the individualized service plan.  • 1 & 2  The information contained in the reports document the identified safety threats, the family's functioning, and the behaviors or conditions that require change for the child to remain safely in or return to the home or obtain permanency through adoption or guardianship.

INSTRUCTIONS TO STAFF 340:75-6-40

Revised 9-16-21

1.  Case plan components.  The case plan components are:

(1) Form 04KI005E, Child's Individualized Service Plan (ISP), per Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) 340:75-6-40.1;

(2) Form 04KI004E, Placement Provider Information, per OAC 340:75-6-40.2;

(3) Form 04KI030E, Assessment of Child Safety, per OAC 340:75-6-40.3;

(4) Form 04KI012E, Individualized Service Plan (ISP), per OAC 340:75-6-40.4;

(5) Form 04KI009E, Court Report, Form 04KI013E, Individualized Service Plan (ISP) Dispositional Report, or Form 04KI014E, Individualized Service Plan (ISP) Progress Report, per OAC 340:75-6-40.5;

(6) Form 04KI046E, Connections Worksheet;

(7) KIDS Contacts screen information, per OAC 340:75-6-40.6; and

(8) family time information, per OAC 340:75-6-30.

2.  Qualified residential treatment program (QRTP).  For a child placed in a QRTP, the assigned specialist must document in the child's case plan:

(1) Oklahoma Human Services' reasonable and good faith effort to identify and include all individuals required to be on the child's family and permanency team, per OAC 340:75-14-1;

(2) all current contact information for members of the child's family and permanency team, as well as contact information for other family members and fictive kin who are not part of the family and permanency team;

(3) evidence that family meetings with the family and permanency team, including meetings related to the required 30-calendar day assessment of the QRTP's appropriateness, are held at a time and place convenient for family;

(4) when reunification is the child's case plan goal, evidence demonstrating that the parent from whom the child was removed provided input on the members of the family and permanency team;

(5) evidence that the required 30-calendar day assessment of the QRTP's appropriateness is determined in conjunction with the family and permanency team;

(6) the family and permanency team's placement preferences related to the required 30-calendar day assessment recognizes children are placed with their siblings unless the court finds that such placement is contrary to the child's best interest; and

(7) when the family and permanency team's and child's placement preferences were not the placement setting recommended by the qualified individual conducting the assessment of the QRTP's appropriateness, the reasons their preferences were not recommended.