Administrative Review Summary Report

Date:  10-10-22

Name of Agency:  Goodland Academy                            Date of off-site review: 07-21-22

Reviewer:  Matthew Smith                                                 Date of on-site review: 09-01-22

Persons interviewed:     Chandy Cowley and                   Date of exit conference: 09-01-22

                                    Clark LeForce

This School Food Authority (SFA) operates the National School Lunch Program, the School Breakfast Program, and the After School Snack Program.\

The following areas were corrected prior to the On-Site Portion of this Administrative Review (AR):

·       Afterschool Snack Program:  The first on-site self-monitoring review was not conducted within the first four weeks of school [as required by federal regulation 7 CFR Part 210.9 (c) (7)].  Prior to the completion of the on-site portion of this AR, Goodland took corrective action by conducting the first on-site self-monitoring review.

·       Civil Rights: Goodland Academy was not using the current USDA approved nondiscrimination statement on program materials and on their written procedure for handling civil rights complaints [as required FNS Instruction 113-1].  Prior to the on-site visit Goodland Academy applied to the USDA for a religious exemption.

·       Civil Rights – Tool for Gathering Data on Program Participants’ Ethnicity and Race:  The enrollment paperwork used to gather data on program participants’ ethnicity and race does not use the federally required two-question format [as required by FNS Instruction 113-1].  Prior to the completion of the on-site portion of this AR, Goodland Academy took corrective action by adding the two-question format to their enrollment application.

·       Local Wellness Policy:  The local wellness policy provided at the time of the off-site visit did not contain a description of the manner in which the public is provided with the opportunity to participate in the local wellness policy [as required by 7 CFR Part 210.31 (c) (5)].  Prior to the on-site visit, Goodland Academy took corrective action by adding this description.

The local wellness policy had not been assessed within three years [as required by 7 CFR Part 210.31 (e) (2)].  Prior to the on-site visit, Goodland academy took corrective action by assessing and updating their policy. 

·       Meal Patterns:  During the menu week assessed (June 12, 2022 – June 18, 2022) non-systemic insufficient serving sizes were discovered during the lunch menu assessment [7 CFR Part 210.10 (c)].  Prior to the on-site visit, Goodland Academy took corrective actions bring all insufficient serving sizes into compliance with the lunch meal pattern for grades 9 – 12.

·       Non-Creditable Item Served as Part of a Lunch:  The lunch served on June 13, 2022, was served with a non-creditable meatball product [7 CFR Part 210.10 Appendix C].  Prior to the on-site visit, Goodland Academy took corrective action by replacing the non-creditable item with a meatball produced from a recipe.

 

No further action is required for the above. 

There were no additional findings for this administrative review.

 

Reviewer’s Comments:  I want to commend Goodland Academy’s personnel who assisted with the completion of this Administrative Review on a job well done.    

Procurement Review Summary Report

Date:  10-10-22

Name of Agency:  Goodland Academy                            Date of AR off-site review: 07-21-22

Reviewer:  Matthew Smith                                                Date of AR on-site review: 09-01-22

Persons interviewed:     Chandy Cowley and                   Date of exit conference: 09-01-22

                                    Clark LeForce

This School Food Authority (SFA) operates the National School Lunch Program, the School Breakfast Program, and the After School Snack Program.

The following areas were corrected during the Procurement Review (PR):

·       Micro-Purchase:  The procurement activity with Walmart exceeded Goodland Academy’s micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 [2 CFR Part 200.320 (a)].  Prior to the on-site portion of the AR, Goodland Academy took corrective action by adopting a new procurement plan that increased the threshold to $50,000.

·       Procurement Plan:  The procurement plan provided during the off-site portion of the Administrative Review for Goodland Academy does not document a cost or price analysis being conducted with every procurement action in excess of the small purchase threshold [as required by federal regulation 2 CFR Part 200.323 (a)]. Prior to the AR On-Site visit, Goodland Academy took corrective action by adopting a new procurement plan that is compliant with federal requirements for procurement plans.

No further action is required for the above.

There were no additional findings for this procurement review.