Attorney General Opinion No. 83-198

While this Opinion concluded that contracts for services of investment counselors were not exempt from competitive bidding requirements of the Central Purchasing Act because “professional services” included only those services defined in 18 O.S. §803, the Act has since been amended to provide an exemption from both the competitive bidding and requisition requirements of the Act for certain investment consultant contracts, other specific services contracts as well as professional services as defined in 18 O.S. §803.  See 74 O.S. 85.7. 

• Introduction
• Oklahoma Central Purchasing Act
• Other Procurement-Related Statutes in Title 74
• Information Technology Procurement
• IT Procurement-Related Statutes in Title 62
• Pay for Success Act
• Oklahoma Correctional Industries Procurement-Related Statute
• OMES Procurement-Related Administrative Rules
• Procurement-Related Caselaw
• Procurement-Related Attorney General Opinions
• Procurement Information Memorandums